We were told that the Cleveland Clinic and Johns Hopkins were Rinky Dink. What happened?

Anyone who follows any of the channels I moderate or own, ( and there are over a million of you folks ) Know that I use research and go to the experts for my information. So when I used the Cleveland Clinic and one of the results ( they tested 52,000 employees and over 1,300 had been infected ). Results were, Not one of the 1359 previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated had a SARS-CoV-2 infection over the duration of the study.  Conclusion Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination. This was done in 2020.

The study was updated in January of 2023.  Conclusions Vaccination reduces risk of COVID-19 among those without prior COVID-19 but not among those with prior COVID-19, at least not within one year following infection. 

I've never said you should not take the Vaccine. What I said was it wasn't for everyone. Follow your doctors advice. Not some loon who has had COVID multiple times( four shots and counting ) and hasn't practised medicine in almost 40 years. Odds are you can get COVID with or without the Vaccine. What we are seeing is that those with the multiple shots are the folks who continue to get COVID.

Why the article? You have a few loons out there who ridiculed several of the top medical centers in the country. Called them rinky dink. One even said you wouldn't catch him dead in a hospital like the Cleveland Clinic if it had heart issues ( forget the fact they're the number one hospital for heart issues ).

Now the same loons will ignore massive studies involving thousands of people. But use the same sources I did only when they find one doctor who agrees with them. So do you go with one doctors opinion? Or a Cleveland Clinic that had 52,000 people in their research study?